|
Below is a general listing of the top authors that deal directly or indirectly with the problems that men face from the state. All their free work isn't located below, but what HN feels are their best efforts from before May 2008. HN will adjust the list if other free web work comes to our attention. Please leave any effort you think deserves attention on our contact page, as we are sure we have missed some, but it is our target to bring the best efforts (we are aware of) to MRAs worldwide.
The below work is different from our blog rankings as sometimes quantity doesn't equal quality. Reporting news and commenting on it is not the focus of the efforts below, but logical long-term ideas. Many of the authors below have other work worth reading, but this is to give you a taste of their work and encourage a professional level of effort, but this is not to encourage any forum of elitism based on age (or time spent in the movement), establishment ties (with for example the traditional media), or even acceptability to moderates who are ready to forfeit constructive radicals at a moments notice (thus dividing the movement in another way) in the vain attempt to become acceptable to those who merely promise reforms year after year.
If such Neville Chamberlain moderates distance themselves from radicals, who are tired of the body count enough to not use honey over vingar anymore, they should suffer a bad rep for the idea of "the perfect being the enemy of the good." For such moderates to distance themselves (for no real reforms in hand) shows a clear disloyalty to the men suffering (despite any of your boasts), as you blame radicals who weaken you position more than the Medusa system in your actions. Your shame, though less than those who wheeled this dysfunction, will live long in many an MRA's compatriot's mind.
Paraphrasing some wise words: "The day after the revolution the radicals become moderates, and the former moderates become unknowing and historical appeasers." Take care not to guard your position as a goal in itself, and always reach out to constructive radicals over ambitious pragmatists.
|
